Finders keeper . . . except on the job

December 27th, 2010 by Philip Brasor & Masako Tsubuku

Earlier this month, the city of Osaka punished 27 municipal employees for “embezzlement” (chakufuku). Usually, embezzlement is the purview of white collar miscreants, but these people all worked for the city’s sanitation bureau cleaning rivers and other publicly run properties. The city says these workers found cash while cleaning 10 rivers and canals and instead of handing the money in to their supervisors they pocketed it.

Famous Glico Man, who overlooks famous Dotonbori Canal in Osaka

Out of 42 employees investigated, six were fired and 21 were suspended without pay. The amounts weren’t particularly large. For instance, between July and October 2009, five people are said to have pocketed a total of ¥150,000 among them. The largest windfall at one time was ¥105,000, which was found and kept by two men who were cleaning the famous Dotonbori Canal. In fact, it was this incident that set off the whole investigation. A third employee who was with the two men recorded the find secretly with his camcorder and then reported it to his superiors. Though this individual might have been celebrated as a whistleblower, he ended up as one of the workers fired since, according to media reports, during subsequent questioning he made verbal threats to company investigators.

Osaka officials did not elaborate on the legal or ethical principles behind the disciplinary measure. Presumably, because the money was found in publicly maintained rivers, it is considered the property of the city unless the owners of the money can be located. But if a person who is not a municipal employee found the money by accident there is no legal recourse for compelling that person to hand the money over to the authorities. Ethically, of course, the person is expected to do so, and the normal procedure is that if no one comes forward to claim the money within a predetermined period of time, the finder gets to keep it. In these circumstances, however, the finders were city employees who found the money while they were on city time, so the money belonged to the city unless someone claimed it. Osaka, it should be noted, is pretty deep in debt, and every little bit helps.

Tags: ,

One Response

  1. Hmmm … stuff like this makes me wonder if “chakufuku” is a peculiarly Osakan phenomenon. (Of course it isn’t, it’s universal!) About ten+ years ago I remember reading of a case in central Osaka whereby an American tourist found an envelope stuffed with cash on the street. Being a law-abiding citizen, she handed it in the nearest information counter. The two employees, seeing that she was a clueless gaijin, took the money and pocketed it. What they hadn’t banked on was the fact that she would return later with a Japanese interpreter. They ended up getting fired. I’m not sure what happened to the money, though.

RSS

Recent posts

Our Users Say

  • Troy: clowns. the country is run by clowns. quadrillions of yen of land value going undertaxed, and they monkey with...
  • gg: From my recent trip to the Pension office, I recall hearing that there were some rule changes expected soon that...
  • lisa warne: nice informative blog…
  • Troy: hmm, looking at the numbers, maybe youth care isn’t such a demographically doomed sector. The ratio of...
  • Troy: “will earn her a license to teach nursery school” ouch, not a demographically wise career choice ....
Japan Times RSS Feed

RECENT JAPAN TIMES HEADLINES

  • No items
Read more:
Okozukai vs. hesokuri: An alternate view of home economics

Wives traditionally control Japanese household finances, but that doesn't mean they have financial freedom.

Close