<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electronics makers lead the way in killing off lifetime employment system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.japantimes.co.jp/yen-for-living/electronics-makers-lead-the-way-in-killing-off-lifetime-employment-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.japantimes.co.jp/yen-for-living/electronics-makers-lead-the-way-in-killing-off-lifetime-employment-system/</link>
	<description>How to make, save and spend money in Japan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamu</title>
		<link>http://blog.japantimes.co.jp/yen-for-living/electronics-makers-lead-the-way-in-killing-off-lifetime-employment-system/comment-page-1/#comment-113050</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.japantimes.co.jp/yen-for-living/?p=3807#comment-113050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who works in a Japanese corporation, I can say at least in my company&#039;s case it still operates under a false assumption of lifetime employment. So when earnings tank as they have, instead of straight-up firing people, they transfer them to positions that put them in limbo, or alternatively pressure them to retire early. And then there are teams of people who are considered &quot;contract&quot; employees and thus are not eligible for the juicier benefits like 401k or access to company dorms, oh and they can be let go once their 12-month contracts are up. My understanding is that Japanese firms are not allowed to fire without cause, and whatever cause they give can&#039;t be for purely economic reasons unless the company is literally going bankrupt. 

I am not sure what my point is, but I just want to say it&#039;s an odd spectacle to see a company trying to bend the rules around economic reality. Sharp might be coming to the end of that road sooner rather than later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who works in a Japanese corporation, I can say at least in my company&#8217;s case it still operates under a false assumption of lifetime employment. So when earnings tank as they have, instead of straight-up firing people, they transfer them to positions that put them in limbo, or alternatively pressure them to retire early. And then there are teams of people who are considered &#8220;contract&#8221; employees and thus are not eligible for the juicier benefits like 401k or access to company dorms, oh and they can be let go once their 12-month contracts are up. My understanding is that Japanese firms are not allowed to fire without cause, and whatever cause they give can&#8217;t be for purely economic reasons unless the company is literally going bankrupt. </p>
<p>I am not sure what my point is, but I just want to say it&#8217;s an odd spectacle to see a company trying to bend the rules around economic reality. Sharp might be coming to the end of that road sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
